Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-59-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-59-2019
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
15 Jan 2019
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 15 Jan 2019

A multi-technology analysis of the 2017 North Korean nuclear test

Peter Gaebler, Lars Ceranna, Nima Nooshiri, Andreas Barth, Simone Cesca, Michaela Frei, Ilona Grünberg, Gernot Hartmann, Karl Koch, Christoph Pilger, J. Ole Ross, and Torsten Dahm

Viewed

Total article views: 7,427 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
5,850 1,290 287 7,427 301 147 128
  • HTML: 5,850
  • PDF: 1,290
  • XML: 287
  • Total: 7,427
  • Supplement: 301
  • BibTeX: 147
  • EndNote: 128
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Oct 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Oct 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 7,427 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 6,093 with geography defined and 1,334 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Discussed (final revised paper)

Discussed (preprint)

Latest update: 22 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
On 3 September 2017 official channels of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea announced the successful test of a nuclear device. This study provides a multi-technology analysis of the 2017 North Korean event and its aftermath using a wide array of geophysical methods (seismology, infrasound, remote sensing, radionuclide monitoring, and atmospheric transport modeling). Our results clearly indicate that the September 2017 North Korean event was in fact a nuclear test.