Journal cover Journal topic
Solid Earth An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.380 IF 2.380
  • IF 5-year value: 3.147 IF 5-year
    3.147
  • CiteScore value: 3.06 CiteScore
    3.06
  • SNIP value: 1.335 SNIP 1.335
  • IPP value: 2.81 IPP 2.81
  • SJR value: 0.779 SJR 0.779
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 32 Scimago H
    index 32
  • h5-index value: 31 h5-index 31
Volume 2, issue 1
Solid Earth, 2, 53–63, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2-53-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Solid Earth, 2, 53–63, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2-53-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Method article 25 May 2011

Method article | 25 May 2011

Open Plot Project: an open-source toolkit for 3-D structural data analysis

S. Tavani et al.
Related subject area  
Structural geology
Actors, actions, and uncertainties: optimizing decision-making based on 3-D structural geological models
Fabian Antonio Stamm, Miguel de la Varga, and Florian Wellmann
Solid Earth, 10, 2015–2043, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-2015-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-2015-2019, 2019
Structure of massively dilatant faults in Iceland: lessons learned from high-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle data
Christopher Weismüller, Janos L. Urai, Michael Kettermann, Christoph von Hagke, and Klaus Reicherter
Solid Earth, 10, 1757–1784, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1757-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1757-2019, 2019
Short summary
Fracturing and crystal plastic behaviour of garnet under seismic stress in the dry lower continental crust (Musgrave Ranges, Central Australia)
Friedrich Hawemann, Neil Mancktelow, Sebastian Wex, Giorgio Pennacchioni, and Alfredo Camacho
Solid Earth, 10, 1635–1649, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1635-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1635-2019, 2019
How can geologic decision-making under uncertainty be improved?
Cristina G. Wilson, Clare E. Bond, and Thomas F. Shipley
Solid Earth, 10, 1469–1488, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1469-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1469-2019, 2019
Short summary
Overprinting translational domains in passive margin salt basins: insights from analogue modelling
Zhiyuan Ge, Matthias Rosenau, Michael Warsitzka, and Rob L. Gawthorpe
Solid Earth, 10, 1283–1300, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1283-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-1283-2019, 2019
Short summary
Cited articles  
Calcagno, P., Chilès, J. P., Courrioux, G., and Guillen, A.: Geological modelling from field data and geological knowledge: Part I. Modelling method coupling 3-D potential-field interpolation and geological rules, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 171, 147–157, 2008.
Cardozo, N. and Allmendinger, R.: OXSStereonet, Ithaca, New York, U.S.A, 2011.
Carrera, N., Muñoz, J. A., and Roca, E.: 3-D reconstruction of geological surfaces by the equivalent dip-domain method: an example from field data of the Cerro Bayo Anticline (Cordillera Oriental, NW Argentine Andes), J. Struct. Geol., 31, 1573–1585, 2009.
Caumon, G., Collon-Drouaillet, P., Carlier, Le., de Veslud, C., Viseur, S., and Sausse, J.: Surface-based 3-D modeling of geological structures, Math. Geosci., 41, 927–945, 2009.
Fernández, O.: Reconstruction of geological structures in 3-D. An example from the southern Pyrenees, PhD thesis, University of Barcelona, 2004.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation