Journal cover Journal topic
Solid Earth An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.380 IF 2.380
  • IF 5-year value: 3.147 IF 5-year
    3.147
  • CiteScore value: 3.06 CiteScore
    3.06
  • SNIP value: 1.335 SNIP 1.335
  • IPP value: 2.81 IPP 2.81
  • SJR value: 0.779 SJR 0.779
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 32 Scimago H
    index 32
  • h5-index value: 31 h5-index 31
Volume 6, issue 1
Solid Earth, 6, 337-346, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-337-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Solid Earth, 6, 337-346, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-337-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 17 Mar 2015

Research article | 17 Mar 2015

Adsorption, desorption and fractionation of As(V) on untreated and mussel shell-treated granitic material

N. Seco-Reigosa1, L. Cutillas-Barreiro2, J. C. Nóvoa-Muñoz2, M. Arias-Estévez2, E. Álvarez-Rodríguez1, M. J. Fernández-Sanjurjo1, and A. Núñez-Delgado1 N. Seco-Reigosa et al.
  • 1Department of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Higher Polytechnic School, University Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain
  • 2Department of Plant Biology and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain

Abstract. As(V) adsorption and desorption were studied on granitic material, coarse and fine mussel shell and granitic material amended with 12 and 24 t ha−1 fine shell, investigating the effect of different As(V) concentrations and different pH as well as the fractions where the adsorbed As(V) was retained. As(V) adsorption was higher on fine than on coarse shell. Mussel shell amendment increased As(V) adsorption on granitic material. Adsorption data corresponding to the unamended and shell-amended granitic material were satisfactory fitted to the Langmuir and Freundlich models. Desorption was always <19% when the highest As(V) concentration (100 mg L−1) was added. Regarding the effect of pH, the granitic material showed its highest adsorption (66%) at pH <6, and it was lower as pH increased. Fine shell presented notable adsorption in the whole pH range between 6 and 12, with a maximum of 83%. The shell-amended granitic material showed high As(V) adsorption, with a maximum (99%) at pH near 8, but decreased as pH increased. Desorption varying pH was always <26%. In the granitic material, desorption increased progressively when pH increased from 4 to 6, contrary to what happened to mussel shell. Regarding the fractionation of the adsorbed As(V), most of it was in the soluble fraction (weakly bound). The granitic material did not show high As(V) retention capacity, which could facilitate As(V) transfer to water courses and to the food chain in case of As(V) compounds being applied on this material; however, the mussel shell amendment increased As(V) retention, making this practice recommendable.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The granitic material presented lower As(V) adsorption capacity than the mussel shell studied. Fine shell showed moderate As(V) retention (higher than coarse shell). The amendment of 12 and 24 t ha-1 fine shell on the granitic material increased As(V) retention. Most of the adsorbed As(V) did not desorb in a wide range of pH. The adsorbed As(V) was retained mainly on the soluble fraction, with weak bindings, also facilitating release and transfer to water, plants and the food chain.
The granitic material presented lower As(V) adsorption capacity than the mussel shell studied....
Citation
Share