Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.165 IF 4.165
  • IF 5-year value: 4.075 IF 5-year 4.075
  • CiteScore value: 4.28 CiteScore 4.28
  • SNIP value: 1.501 SNIP 1.501
  • SJR value: 1.060 SJR 1.060
  • IPP value: 4.21 IPP 4.21
  • h5-index value: 29 h5-index 29
  • Scimago H index value: 27 Scimago H index 27
Volume 9, issue 6 | Copyright
Solid Earth, 9, 1225-1238, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-1225-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 07 Nov 2018

Research article | 07 Nov 2018

Enhanced pore space analysis by use of μ-CT, MIP, NMR, and SIP

Zeyu Zhang1, Sabine Kruschwitz2,3, Andreas Weller4, and Matthias Halisch5 Zeyu Zhang et al.
  • 1Southwest Petroleum University, School of Geoscience and Technology, 610500 Chengdu, China
  • 2Federal Institute for Material Research and Testing (BAM), 12205 Berlin, Germany
  • 3Technische Universität Berlin, Institute of Civil Engineering, 13355 Berlin, Germany
  • 4Clausthal University of Technology, Institute of Geophysics, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
  • 5Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics (LIAG), 30655 Hannover, Germany

Abstract. We investigate the pore space of rock samples with respect to different petrophysical parameters using various methods, which provide data on pore size distributions, including micro computed tomography (μ-CT), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and spectral-induced polarization (SIP). The resulting cumulative distributions of pore volume as a function of pore size are compared. Considering that the methods differ with regard to their limits of resolution, a multiple-length-scale characterization of the pore space is proposed, that is based on a combination of the results from all of these methods. The approach is demonstrated using samples of Bentheimer and Röttbacher sandstone. Additionally, we compare the potential of SIP to provide a pore size distribution with other commonly used methods (MIP, NMR). The limits of resolution of SIP depend on the usable frequency range (between 0.002 and 100Hz). The methods with similar resolution show a similar behavior of the cumulative pore volume distribution in the overlapping pore size range. We assume that μ-CT and NMR provide the pore body size while MIP and SIP characterize the pore throat size. Our study shows that a good agreement between the pore radius distributions can only be achieved if the curves are adjusted considering the resolution and pore volume in the relevant range of pore radii. The MIP curve with the widest range in resolution should be used as reference.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We investigate the pore space of rock samples with respect to different petrophysical parameters using various methods, which provide data on pore size distributions. The resulting cumulative distributions of pore volume as a function of pore size are compared. Considering that the methods differ with regard to their limits of resolution, a multiple-length-scale characterization of the pore space geometry is proposed that is based on a combination of the results from all of these methods.
We investigate the pore space of rock samples with respect to different petrophysical parameters...
Citation
Share